Friday, November 4, 2016

Welcome



Topic: Minimum wage debate: Economic standpoint
Kaylin's article is about why we should not raise the minimum wage and reasons why. She uses three articles to back up her stance. One of the articles: The Case Against The Minimum Wage by Daniel Bier talks about how economists agree that we should not raise the minimum, and then goes on to give examples on what would happen if we did raise the minimum. In the second article, titled The pros and cons of raising the minimum wage, by Chad Halvorson, talks about how raising the minimum wage will have more down sides than up. And last, but not least, the third article, 9 Reasons Why Raising the Minimum Wage Is a Terrible Idea; It's time for economic facts, not Fallacies, by Ira Stoll states how the minimum wage should be different in each state, and not have the federal government change the minimum wage.

Topic: Minimum Wage Effects on Employment Opportunities
Jennifer's article is about increasing minimum wage and its negative effects on employment opportunities. The article "Negative Effects of Minimum Wage" by Chris Edwards covers two reasons as to why raising the minimum wage would negatively effect employment opportunities in our country. Edwards explains each point in detail in order to support his argument.

Topic: By Comparison
 Thelma’s article focuses on the comparison of minimum wage between developed countries, Australia, in particular. Alanna Petroff, the author of the article This country has the best minimum wage in the world on CNN, does a quick debrief as to how Australian workers are living well from an economic standpoint. 


Topic: Need a Change in Lives of Low Wage Workers
Devanshi's article focuses on answering questions on why minimum wage should be raise and how low workers lives suffers from minimum wage. Peter Van Buren gives an quick view on where and how minimum wage is troubling workers through his article, "You Can't Earn Living on Minimum Wage."

Topic: The Effects of the Minimum Wage and Other Public Policies on High School Graduation  Katelyn Kowald; Presently with the recent constant rise of cost in Higher Education, the enrollment levels have slowly decreased for high school graduates, etc.  People are choosing to go straight into the workforce right after high school because they can’t afford to continue their education.  Unfortunately most these individuals will be lucky to earn anything more than minimum at their starting jobs with their lack of experience and college education.  This all seem problematic because people are in a way find themselves with very few opportunities of obtaining a better paying job, or the means to afford a college degree.  Finding a way to raise entry level pay (minimum wage) and facilitating the opportunity of obtaining additional education for the common workforce, would slowly but surely in many ways help those who struggle financially in our society today. 


Summary:
Should we raise minimum wage so fast food employee's make $15 an hour? Should we raise it so that  the single mother can make ends meet and still have time with her kids? Or should we not raise the minimum wage because, why pay someone a higher minimum if they do the minimum work, minimum effort, and minimum education. Minimum wage is a big debate, especially since Americans love their money.Many questions are left unanswered leaving us dazed. Follow along as Kaylin, Thelma, Jennifer, Devanshi, and Katelyn take on the roles of discovering and pointing out issues on whether or not minimum wage should be raised or just stay the same.



Katelyn Kowald
The issue that I am going to speak with you today is raising minimum wage. My personal take on raising minimum wage is that we shouldn’t raise it, because I feel like it lowers kid’s ambition to get a higher education and lowers their ambition to get graduate from high school. This article I found on Wellesley College Digital Scholarship and Archives written by Anna Morris that is over ‘The Effects of the Minimum Wage and Other Public Policies on High School Graduation.’ First I am going to talk to you about the facts I found on this topic and how it correlates to what I think and then I am going to give you a scenario.
One thing stated in this article that really stuck out to me was the fact that the United States spends a lot of money on higher education, in fact we spend more money than any other country on education. Now with that being said, we spend more money than other countries but our high school graduation rate is lacking compared to other counties. “In 2009, the U.S. ranked twenty-one among OECD countries (Morris, 4).” Why is it lacking, I think it is lacking due to minimum wage steadily increasing. “Facing lower earnings in the labor market makes students less likely to leave school to apply for such a job (Morris, 5).” Basically the lower minimum wage is the lower chance that a high school student would drop out to join the work force and a lower chance a high school graduate would continue education to better themselves if minimum wage is too low to support themselves on their own.
If you were able to receive a pretty good amount of money an hour working at McDonalds flipping burgers, let’s say fifteen dollars an hour, then why would you go to the trouble to go to college? People go to college to get a ‘better job’ and make ‘better money,’ but they actually end up getting themselves in debt because of how much school costs these days. If you could make enough money to cover your living expenses and you could take care of yourself with the money you make from that work place then you would not go to the trouble to get your higher education, because you wouldn’t need to go to college, it would just take more effort.
In conclusion, students need to have something to look forward to in life, meaning having a professional job, making good money and putting in the effort to get there. We need to recognize things that are hurting our younger generation’s ambition in this world and fix it. Raising the minimum wage is not going to help these kids see that they need to work hard and study to get where they want to be.

Need a Change in Lives of Low Wage Workers

Devanshi Devani


             Minimum wage debate poses many questions in many areas and sounds like a confusing topic. Only simple way to find conclusion is to raise minimum wage. Raising minimum wage does not have to be raise to $15. There are many aspects to be noted while rising minimum wage. For example, will the full time workers earn more than poverty line is decided per federal government? Today’s blog will be discussing why and how minimum wage should be raised.



            In article “You Can’t Earn Living on Minimum Wage”, by Peter Van Buren, clearly states that there is need to be raise in minimum wage because of the expenses of the workers. He implies that, “a rise in the minimum wage is only half the battle; employees need enough hours of work to make a living.” On his take on hours cutting is that employees aren’t given full 40 hours week. Employers are giving 39 hours to detached employees from full employment benefits. At the end, it is resulting in not getting paid enough to have dinner every night.

            Can businesses afford to pay higher wage? It is clear that small businesses aren’t able to pay higher wage. According to Buren, “Overall, 60% of minimum-wage workers are employed by businesses not officially considered "small" by government standards” which eliminates the question, can businesses afford to pay higher wage? Buren supports by, “This is disingenuous indeed, since 20 mega-companies dominate the minimum-wage world. Walmart alone employs 1.4 million minimum-wage workers; Yum Brands (Taco Bell, Pizza Hut, KFC) is in second place; and McDonald's takes third.

            As a low wage worker, we should all be able to see that these large companies are our source to increase our wage. These companies find a loophole to be not involved, but they should be the one helping to raise minimum wage. As stated in Buren’s article, Walmart’s workers our one of the large group to use funding like food stamps, WIC cards and etc. It is obvious that these workers are under poverty line.

Problems as serious as this should be priorities by our government. This should be the eye opening time for our government to make change in our system. A full time worker in wealthy country as ours is living under the poverty line decided by our federal government portrays that we need change in minimum wage. The following chart represents the annual earning of full time worker paid minimum wage and where they stand at poverty line.   


         


As mentioned earlier, rising minimum wage doesn’t mean rising to $15. Federal government should act on the new minimum wage standard where it will be benefiting everyone. If this not being in consideration than they have to make sure that rents of the apartment, gas, or any other things shouldn’t be raising prices. It is an impossible for a low wage worker to pay their bills if everything boosting except their salary. Now it is necessary for our country to raise minimum wage to an extent where our country would be stable in all form and shape. Economic is not only for businesses, but it should be for every type of workers. 


Credit:
Buren, Peter Van. "You Can't Earn a Living on the Minimum Wage." The Huffington Post. TheHuffingtonPost.com, 16 Feb. 2016. Web. 02 Nov. 2016.

Will You Be Losing Your Job?

Jennifer Cortez
            Sometimes what you wanted is not always what you expected. If you want minimum wage to increase to $15 an hour, think again. An increase in minimum wage would theoretically benefit a working person’s income, but there are other factors that need to be taken into consideration before a nationwide decision is made. In today’s post, we will be discussing the negative effects of increasing minimum wage on employment opportunities.
            In the article "Negative Effects of Minimum Wage," Chris Edwards brings up two important reasons as to why increasing the minimum wage to $15 would not benefit our country. Edwards’ first point states “minimum wages reduce the work available for low-skill workers.” He supports his reasoning by asserting that employers will shift from manual labor to mechanical labor. An example of this would be a store having self check outs instead of cashiers because they are cheaper to maintain financially. This will then lead to a decrease in hours and possibly lose of occupation. Ultimately, the minimum wage increase will result “in a rise in poverty among these households.” Based on statistics, minimum wage increase cut employment opportunities for low-skilled workers. It is estimated that for every 10% increase in the minimum wage, employment for low-skilled workers is reduced by 1 to 3 percent. Majority of the states across the country have their minimum wage set at $7.25 an hour. If increased to $15 an hour, that would be about a 106% increase to their minimum meaning a multitude of jobs for low-skilled workers would be lost nationwide. By incrementing the minimum wage, we should be helping them financially not hurting them.

            Edwards’ second point states, “minimum wages do not alleviate poverty.” He supports his reasoning with the use of Census data. Surprisingly, it was found that majority of workers who earn between $7.25 and $10.10 per hour live in non-poor households. Out of all the workers who would be affected by the minimum wage increase, only 13% of those workers live in a poor household. Edwards also identified that “nearly two-thirds [of minimum wage employees] live in households with incomes over twice the poverty live, and over 40 percent live in households with incomes over three times the poverty line.” Although a minimum wage raise would financially benefit poor households, a not so drastic increase would be needed since majority of minimum wage workers live in non-poor households.
            I agree with both of Edwards’ reasons as to why minimum wage should not be increased to $15 an hour. It is logical that companies will begin to use mechanical labor instead of manual labor if minimum wage is increased. A machine will not ask for $15 an hour, but a person will. On top of that, other beneficiaries come into play that are necessary for an employee that a machine does not require. If mechanical labor is not installed and a company is required to pay their employees $15 an hour, they will either need to reduce employee hours or lose a few workers in order to be able to pay their current staff.  If neither route is taken, then prices will begin to increase in order to pay their employees and still make some profit. This is important especially to small businesses who do not have money laying around like big companies do to pay their workers. On top of this, there will be less level-entry jobs for those first job seekers, specifically teenagers, who have no work experience. Since jobs will be required to pay their employees more, they are most likely going to go for the person who knows what they are doing so they do not need to spend time training them. This will then make it difficult for them to find a job leaving them unemployed. As for the second reason, if majority of the minimum wage workers are living in a non-poor household, then why is a such extreme minimum wage increase needed? People assume increasing it so high will lift families straight out of poverty, but they do not see those who will fall deeper into poverty when they lose their jobs. In the end, it depends on the person and their experience on whether they will keep their occupation or not.
           Overall, I believe raising the minimum wage will not benefit poverty or our country. Even though it is a proposed idea, realistically, it will only hurt us. We want to move forward as a country, not take two steps back. As Edwards asserts, “such mandated increases do more harm than good, and they hurt the exact groups of people that policymakers say that they want to help.” Instead of helping, we are just creating an even bigger problem that can be avoided by keeping minimum wage the same.
Here is a visual summarizing the points covered in the entry above.
Works Cited
Boudreaux, Don. "Economics: Is Raising Minimum Wage A Bad Idea? - Learn Liberty," Youtube           uploaded by Learn Liberty, 14 January 2016, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9aCpaON5NyE.
Edwards, Chris. "Negative Effects of Minimum Wage." Cato Institute, 8 Apr. 2016. Web. Accessed            28 Oct. 2016.

By Comparison, Why Not?

Thelma Martinez



To truly comprehend the state of the average American worker, we must compare it to other developed countries, and the conditions they set on their citizens. It is easy to disregard the irregularity of one’s own country, if no outside perspective is sought. Although, the United States is home to the highest GDP in the world, it is outranked by several other countries in its minimum wage. That alone should spark, at the very least, a concern for the circulation of currency in the US. 



In This country has the best minimum wage in the world, Alanna Petroff helps convey the differences between countries with a graph of the top ten national minimum wages in the world. The US is not a part of these top ten. However, the graph converts the currency to US dollars, for the sake of comprehension. Also, the publisher makes note of some leading countries who are not included in the graph despite being some of the higher ranking developed countries, 
Finland, Sweden, Denmark, Norway, Iceland, Austria, Switzerland and Italy were not included in this OECD list because these nations do not have federal rules on minimum wages. However, many of these nations are known for paying relatively high wages because of the strength of worker unions. (Provided in Notes when the image is clicked)
Disregarding the advancements of other countries can only result in what I consider to be the fall in the American economy.

  Raising the minimum wage does not necessarily have to be raised from $7.25 to a straight $15. I am aware that such a leap is too far of a leap, for many reasons. There needs to be consideration for those who are not for this change; there needs to be compromise. A steady growth towards the optimum wage for both the minimum wage worker, and the US economy, is what would be ideal. 

We cannot chalk up inflation as the main reason to not raise the minimum wage. Any individual residing in the US can see, everything has gone up in terms of prices. From produce to utilities, overall expenses have gotten higher. It would make sense to adjust our wages in order to suit the increase in the price of living. You don’t buy yourself a decent laptop, keep it for a substantial amount of time, use it every day, and not update it. You want your laptop to run as efficiently as possible, right? Out of respect for our country, and its hard working residents, we need to come together and acknowledge that our minimum wage standard needs an update.

As for considering the living standard of minimum wage workers, it’s obvious that $7.25 is nowhere near enough to live comfortably, let alone get by. In comparison, Australian workers, have a more optimal lifestyle. Americans are strong believers in working for what you have, that is what we have made the American dream out to be. If you work hard enough, you should be able to get what you give. Working forty hour weeks should not result in poverty.

Our economy needs to be an economy that works for all. Easing the burden off of some, is ultimately going to ease the burden on all. If more receive a more livable wage, more money will be spent. More individuals will be able to put their money towards further education, thus leading to better jobs and better incomes, thus creating a better opportunity for growth in current Americans, and the future. Less individuals will need to rely on welfare, and food stamps, because of a better income for themselves, and their family. The endless possibilities of a better country outweigh the common misconceptions of a more debilitated America.  

Even with a higher wage and public services, Australia is not doing as horrendous as one would think. The country has a growing economy, with some of the most open trading agreements, ideal working opportunities for all citizens. Not to say that America has to model the entirety of its government to that of Australia’s, but it’s easy to debunk most if not all stigmas against raising the minimum wage based off this prime example. 


Minimum wage debate: Ecomonic Standpoint



Kaylin Holbrook
Minimum Wage has been a debate for the past couple of years. People have many reasons why they think minimum wage should increase or stay the same, but have they ever stopped and thought what the outcome would be? In today's post, we will be looking at an economic standpoint on why we should not increase minimum wage.
In the article 9 Reasons Why Raising the Minimum Wage Is a Terrible Idea by Ira Stoll states facts and reasons why raising the minimum wage is a bad idea on an economic point-of-view. Stoll's stance is against raising minimum wage because, " It's a big country. The costs of living, especially housing, vary widely in America from state to state and city to city." Meaning the cost of living goes up and down in different areas of America. I agree with this statement because, although, the united states are a united country each individual state has a different way of adapting to life. $15 dollars in Texas is a lot of money for the minimal worker, but $15 in New York could be a good average because of their way if living. Therefore, the minimum wage should also vary from state-to-state. Stoll also says. " twenty states already have higher wages than the federal minimum," therefore, why should we make the federal minimum raise if we can just petition and ask the states to raise their minimum wage? He brings up a good point here. I never thought of just having the states bump up their minimum to fit their needs. From my understanding and from what Stoll just said, I can safely say that minimum wage increase should not be a concern at federal level. If the federal wage is raised that will probably put more people in debt and out of a job because the economy can not support them. When the economy can not support the people, that is when we start to get in trouble and become a corrupt country. Jealousy will raise even higher for the people who do have money, and people will become even more stingy and do anything just to get a dollar.

When most people think of minimum wage they think of teenagers working a part-time job. And that's what minimum wage should pay for; teenagers. Stoll says, " A lot of minimum wage earners are second or third-job holders in the household. This means, the teenagers who have jobs, have both parents working. Minimum wage workers also include retirees with income from savings and Social Security who own their homes mortgage free." To sum that up, minimum wage workers are workers who are entry level, like teenagers, or retired people who are living off their Social Security. I agree with Stolls statement because in most restruants, yogurt shops, and stores like Target have teenagers working there. On the other hand, the adults who have to provide for their family don't get settle for $7.25 an hour. If the sole provider does have a minimum wage job, I ensure you they are looking for another job to get paid at a higher rate that suits their budget because they have motivation (a family) to earn more than the minimum. But, if the sole provider is not looking for more than a minimum wage job, one, these are probably the people who want to raise minimum wage so they won't have to get a higher education to move up the ladder in life, and two, there are more Millennial's and Gen Next generations who are stereotyped as "lazy" but have more ambition to find a higher paying job than the sole provider.

Moving on to how it will affect the economy, Stoll points out three very important aspects. The first one would be, "raising the minimum wage will eliminate jobs." I agree with this because, businesses would be forced to pay a higher wage to the minimum level workers, therefore, there would be a decreased need for entry level workers. The second point from Stoll is, "Businesses will be likely to consider replacing workers with robots or computers, as a long-term investment." If you think this is insane, think again. Machines have been replacing workers from day one. Think of the cotton picker, online banking, or even machine telemarketers. If the wage is increased business will have no choice but to replace the minimum workers ( entry level work) with machines. Another example is Europe, they already have machines that take orders to replace the workers, so they could cut back on wage prices.

  The last point Stoll mentioned was, "A minimum wage increase will reduce the incentives for low-wage workers to get an education to move up to a higher-paying job." This statement is probably the most important and accurate because, today's generation of young workers, and even generations below them are becoming lazy and just want the easy way in life. They will have no goals or ambitions to even think about getting an education to increase there amount of income. They will literally work their 5-7 hour job, play video games, and sleep. In the long run this will not be economically stable because there will be less doctors, lawyers, and other professional workers to replace the ones we have today. And this will lead to the $15 minimum wage workers to make no wage because there is no suitable CEO, or boss man to run the business in a declining economy.  A good example of Stolls main point can be watched in the video:  The truth about minimum wage .  
In the article, The pros and cons of raising the minimum wage, by Chad Halvorson also states why minimum wage should not be raised. Halvorson states, "Minimum wage increases will lead to layoffs, price increases, fewer hiring’s, and outsourcing jobs.” These cons of increasing the wage, will affect the economy greatly. When layoffs happen, it leads to more unemployment, which was the whole reason why people wanted a wage increase in the first place. And layoffs will happen because when “the same number of employees are at a business and they are being paid at a higher rate, business can no longer support that many workers.” (Halvorson) For an example, if the original cost of an apple is $1, when the minimum increases the apple price could move up to $4 because of increased wages. Although the wages were increased, the company must make an equity, therefore, the consumer pays difference. In simple terms, minimum wage increases = price increases = consumers end up paying the difference.This will also lead to fewer hiring's because they will outsource to another country who they will be able to pay less. If you had the option to pay someone $5 or $15 which would you pick? In the end, the big picture of raising minimum wage will create fewer jobs for the people who the minimum wage was supposed to help.

            In the last article, The Case Against the Minimum wage by Daniel Bier, his economic point-of-view is simple, raising the minimum wage will lead to unemployment. Bier says, “We will have a surplus of workers (surplus meaning unemployment) from employers laying off their employees, and it would be harder for young and unskilled workers to get entry level jobs.”  I agree with this statement because young workers are new and naive when they enter the work force. This is the whole reason for a minimum wage; the entry level workers receive the lower paying jobs so they can build relationships, knowledge and an understanding of how the work place really works. This is even true for me. When I first entered the work force at the age of 16, I was getting paid $7.25, but now, two years later, my wages have increased, and I have had an internship, which gives me experience, knowledge, and responsibilities that may lead to a higher wage in the future. Companies would want to hire people who already know what they are doing so they wouldn't have to spend time and money on a minimal worker to train them.

            Bier also states that, “workers may get a few weeks or months of higher pay, only to be unable to get a job at all in the future, therefore, their wages will drop to zero.” To expand on this statement, the people who are already working may get higher wages, but when they get laid off, fired, or if they even quit, they will have a difficult time entering the work force again with the competing market for jobs. Increased wages lead to the employers, “cutting back hours, laying off the least productive workers, hiring fewer new inexperienced workers, replacing labor with robots, and replacing lower skilled workers with fewer and higher skilled workers” according to Bier. I also agree with this statement because companies will want to spend their money sparingly, and only higher the top suitable employees, which does not include the least productive workers. Watch the video below for more information about how minimum wage works.
 Video:How does the Minimum Wage work? 


            In the end, minimum wage should not be increased because it will cause the economy to increase unemployment. Raised wages include layoffs, cut backs, unemployment outsourcing, price increases, fewer hiring’s, and eliminates jobs. According to Barrack Obama, he says “No one who works full-time should have to live in poverty.” This statement is true to an extent, but most of the people getting minimum wage are teenagers, and retired people, so this statement is not true. If we do raise the minimum it will lead to a surplus of workers and higher unemployment. The minimum wage should not be raised by the federal government, because each state has a different standard of living. A minimum wage is meant to help, not hurt the minimal workers, therefore, raising the wage will do just the opposite. Raising it will make the companies get rid of the minimal workers (teenagers) and find higher educational workers or replace the workers with machines so they can get more bang for their buck. Another outcome of raising the wage is raising the prices on goods and services so the business will not go in debt. But as Americans are know for, they like there money, and they like a lot of it. Raising the price on goods and services will lead to less consumers buying products, and this is a key aspect in keeping the economy going. Less buyers equals less products being bought, which equals a decline in money moving around the economy, which means the economy decline.



Ira-stoll. "9 Reasons Why Raising the Minimum Wage Is a Terrible Idea." Reason.com. N.p., 03 Mar. 2014. Web. 25 Oct. 2016.
Bier, By Daniel. "The Case Against the Minimum Wage." The Skeptical Libertarian. N.p., 25 Feb. 2013. Web. 25 Oct. 2016.
Halvorson, Chad. "The Pros and Cons of Raising the Minimum Wage." When I Work. N.p., 06 Mar. 2014. Web. 25 Oct. 2016.