Kaylin
Holbrook
Minimum Wage has been a debate for the past couple of years.
People have many reasons why they think minimum wage should increase or stay
the same, but have they ever stopped and thought what the outcome would be? In
today's post, we will be looking at an economic standpoint on why we should not
increase minimum wage.
In the article 9 Reasons Why Raising the Minimum Wage
Is a Terrible Idea by Ira Stoll states facts and reasons why raising
the minimum wage is a bad idea on an economic point-of-view. Stoll's stance is
against raising minimum wage because, " It's a big country. The costs of
living, especially housing, vary widely in America from state to state and city
to city." Meaning the cost of living goes up and down in different areas
of America. I agree with this statement because, although, the united states are
a united country each individual state has a different way of adapting to life.
$15 dollars in Texas is a lot of money for the minimal worker, but $15 in New
York could be a good average because of their way if living. Therefore, the minimum wage should also vary from state-to-state. Stoll also says.
" twenty states already have higher wages than the federal minimum,"
therefore, why should we make the federal minimum raise if we can just petition
and ask the states to raise their minimum wage? He brings up a good point here. I never
thought of just having the states bump up their minimum to fit their needs. From my understanding and from what Stoll just said, I can safely say that minimum wage increase should not be a concern at federal level. If the federal wage is raised that will probably put more people in debt and out of a job because the economy can not support them. When the economy can not support the people, that is when we start to get in trouble and become a corrupt country. Jealousy will raise even higher for the people who do have money, and people will become even more stingy and do anything just to get a dollar.
Moving on to how it will affect the economy, Stoll points out
three very important aspects. The first one would be, "raising the minimum
wage will eliminate jobs." I agree with this because, businesses would be
forced to pay a higher wage to the minimum level workers, therefore, there
would be a decreased need for entry level workers. The second point from Stoll
is, "Businesses will be likely to consider replacing workers with robots
or computers, as a long-term investment." If you think this is insane, think again. Machines have been replacing workers from day one. Think of the cotton picker, online banking, or even machine telemarketers. If the wage is increased business will have no choice but to replace the minimum workers ( entry level work) with machines. Another example is Europe, they already have machines that take orders to replace the workers, so
they could cut back on wage prices.
The last point Stoll mentioned was, "A minimum wage increase will reduce
the incentives for low-wage workers to get an education to move up to a
higher-paying job." This statement is probably the most important and accurate
because, today's generation of young workers, and even generations
below them are becoming lazy and just want the easy way in life. They will have no goals
or ambitions to even think about getting an education to increase there amount of income. They will literally work their 5-7 hour job, play video games, and sleep. In the long run this will not be economically stable because there will be less doctors, lawyers, and other professional workers to replace
the ones we have today. And this will lead to the $15 minimum wage workers to
make no wage because there is no suitable CEO, or boss man to run the business
in a declining economy. A good example of Stolls main point can be watched in
the video: The truth
about minimum wage .
In the article, The pros and cons of raising the
minimum wage, by Chad Halvorson also states why minimum wage should not be raised. Halvorson states, "Minimum wage increases will lead to
layoffs, price increases, fewer hiring’s, and outsourcing jobs.” These cons of
increasing the wage, will affect the economy greatly. When layoffs happen, it
leads to more unemployment, which was the whole reason why people wanted a wage
increase in the first place. And layoffs will happen because when “the same
number of employees are at a business and they are being paid at a higher rate,
business can no longer support that many workers.” (Halvorson) For an example, if the original cost of an apple is $1, when the minimum increases the apple price could move up to $4 because of
increased wages. Although the wages were increased, the company must make an
equity, therefore, the consumer pays difference. In simple terms, minimum wage
increases = price increases = consumers end up paying the difference.This will also lead to fewer hiring's because they will outsource to another country who they will be able to pay less. If you had the option to pay someone $5 or $15 which would you pick? In the end, the big picture of raising minimum wage will create fewer jobs for the people who the minimum wage was supposed to help.
In the last article, The Case Against the Minimum wage by Daniel Bier,
his economic point-of-view is simple, raising the minimum wage will lead to
unemployment. Bier says, “We will have a surplus of
workers (surplus meaning unemployment) from employers laying off their
employees, and it would be harder for young and unskilled workers to get entry
level jobs.” I agree with this statement because young workers are new and naive when they enter the work force. This is the whole reason for a minimum wage; the entry level workers receive the lower paying jobs so they can build relationships, knowledge and an understanding of how the work place really works. This is even true for me. When I first entered the work force at the age of 16, I was getting paid $7.25, but now, two years later, my wages have increased, and I have had an internship, which gives me experience, knowledge, and responsibilities that may lead to a higher wage in the future. Companies would want to hire people who already know what they are doing so they wouldn't have to spend time and money on a minimal worker to train them.
Bier also states that, “workers may get a few weeks or months of higher pay, only to be unable to get a job at all in the future, therefore, their wages will drop to zero.” To expand on this statement, the people who are already working may get higher wages, but when they get laid off, fired, or if they even quit, they will have a difficult time entering the work force again with the competing market for jobs. Increased wages lead to the employers, “cutting back hours, laying off the least productive workers, hiring fewer new inexperienced workers, replacing labor with robots, and replacing lower skilled workers with fewer and higher skilled workers” according to Bier. I also agree with this statement because companies will want to spend their money sparingly, and only higher the top suitable employees, which does not include the least productive workers. Watch the video below for more information about how minimum wage works.
Bier also states that, “workers may get a few weeks or months of higher pay, only to be unable to get a job at all in the future, therefore, their wages will drop to zero.” To expand on this statement, the people who are already working may get higher wages, but when they get laid off, fired, or if they even quit, they will have a difficult time entering the work force again with the competing market for jobs. Increased wages lead to the employers, “cutting back hours, laying off the least productive workers, hiring fewer new inexperienced workers, replacing labor with robots, and replacing lower skilled workers with fewer and higher skilled workers” according to Bier. I also agree with this statement because companies will want to spend their money sparingly, and only higher the top suitable employees, which does not include the least productive workers. Watch the video below for more information about how minimum wage works.
In the end, minimum wage should not be increased because it will cause the
economy to increase unemployment. Raised wages include layoffs, cut backs,
unemployment outsourcing, price increases, fewer hiring’s, and eliminates jobs.
According to Barrack Obama, he says “No one who works full-time should have to
live in poverty.” This statement is true to an extent, but most of the people getting
minimum wage are teenagers, and retired people, so this statement is not true.
If we do raise the minimum it will lead to a surplus of workers and higher
unemployment. The minimum wage should not be raised by the federal
government, because each state has a different standard of living. A
minimum wage is meant to help, not hurt the minimal workers, therefore, raising
the wage will do just the opposite. Raising it will make the companies
get rid of the minimal workers (teenagers) and find higher educational workers or
replace the workers with machines so they can get more bang for their
buck. Another outcome of raising the wage is raising the prices on goods
and services so the business will not go in debt. But as Americans are
know for, they like there money, and they like a lot of it. Raising the
price on goods and services will lead to less consumers buying products,
and this is a key aspect in keeping the economy going. Less buyers equals less products being bought, which equals a decline in money moving around the economy, which means the economy decline.
Ira-stoll. "9 Reasons Why Raising the Minimum Wage Is a
Terrible Idea." Reason.com. N.p., 03 Mar. 2014. Web. 25 Oct. 2016.
Bier, By Daniel. "The Case Against the Minimum
Wage." The Skeptical Libertarian. N.p., 25 Feb. 2013. Web. 25 Oct.
2016.
Halvorson, Chad. "The Pros and Cons of Raising the
Minimum Wage." When I Work. N.p., 06 Mar. 2014. Web. 25 Oct. 2016.
No comments:
Post a Comment